Excess nutrients entering the Gulf of Mississippi River Basin are a major contributor to the hypoxia zone in the Gulf of Mexico. In addition to state-based nutrient reduction strategies, there is a critical need for states to share knowledge about nutrient concentrations and resulting impacts on waterways, and to engage with the public on current conditions and actions they can take to help minimize the issue and protect their health.
Volunteer water monitoring, which engages laypersons in monitoring local waterways, has been used to inform communities of impaired waters, aid in the development and modification of natural resource regulations, and help obtain protected status for waterbodies (Da Silva Pinho, 2000; Karney, 2000; Deutsch et al., 2007; Stepenuck, 2013). Often, volunteers collect data where there has been little or no other monitoring conducted, thus their results have the potential to provide localized, relevant information to communities.
Extension educators play a key role in helping the public understand conditions in local streams and lakes and engaging individuals in water-related issues. Unfortunately, there is often a disconnect between volunteer water monitoring programs and Extension educators. Thus, volunteer monitoring data, which can be used as an aid in community outreach programs designed to help citizens help themselves, are often underutilized. Establishing connections between Extension educators and volunteer water monitoring programs across states can enhance nutrient condition knowledge and better equip communities to address the resulting impacts to waterways.
The primary goal of this project was to increase connectivity between Extension educators and volunteer nutrient monitoring program personnel and spread relevant knowledge across the upper Midwest region. Specifically, the project team aimed to increase knowledge of:
Addressing the Challenge
In April 2015 a collective group of Extension and non-Extension partners including agriculture and natural resource educators and volunteer monitoring program coordinators from Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, South Dakota, and Wisconsin met and shared information, knowledge, and data on ongoing outreach programming and volunteer monitoring program models, parameters, methods, and goals.
Following the meeting, the group administered a survey to water educators throughout partner states collecting data on current nutrient-related water quality outreach activities and the needs and barriers faced by these individuals. The survey enabled the group to create an inventory of outreach materials and programs currently in use by Extension and partner organizations related to nutrients and water quality across the five participating states. This inventory was used to conduct a needs assessment of nutrient educational activities related to water quality.
Program Outcomes and Impacts
Results from the water educator survey showed that the majority of educators used presentations, field days, workshops, and classroom lectures most commonly to deliver nutrient and water quality information. Educators in all five states also reported using brochures, fact-sheets and slideshows often as educational deliverables. The primary barriers for nutrient-water quality outreach were lack of time to develop and implement outreach and lack of funding.
In addition to the water educator survey, project collaborators, including Extension and non-Extension educators and volunteer monitoring program coordinators, were surveryed. Respondents noted they increased their awareness and understanding of people in other states who are working on similar topics, and where to find information and resources on similar topics a ‘moderate’ or ‘large’ extent. 80% of respondents formed new working relationships with Extension professionals across states and 70% expanded their working relationship with other non-Extensions professionals a ‘moderate’ or ‘large’ extent. Additionally, 90% of respondents increased their knowledge of volunteer nutrient monitoring programming and methods across the region a ‘moderate’ or ‘large’ extent.
“Volunteer monitoring programs are generally limited in terms of staffing and funding. This project gave me an opportunity to discuss ways to leverage existing program ideas/materials/individuals to expand our program. We don’t work with extension on a regular basis in our state and I think the project also strengthened those relationships to help build outreach on water quality issues and volunteer monitoring.”
“The key benefit for me was working with my cohorts (volunteer coordinators) from other states. Some unification or standardization of analyses, methods, analyses, outreach topics, etc. could ultimately allow for consistency of data and water quality education across state borders.”
Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Extension